NRP Partisans can execute surrenderers

[hauptmann 4]

Since partisans are basicly irregular troops and mostly fighting out of revenge, I think it would add to the roleplay experience if partisans were allowed to kill yielders without orders from an admin or an officer.

[Isaac 45]

24 minutes ago, hauptmann said:

Since partisans are basicly irregular troops and mostly fighting out of revenge, I think it would add to the roleplay experience if partisans were allowed to kill yielders without orders from an admin or an officer.

I disagree with this. 

 

1. Surrenders should be only killed by a firing line.

2. Should not restrict one Class to be able to kill surrenders with out a firing line. 

3. It will cause a lot of shit and people not understanding the rules.

4. It will cause other classes to think they can do it. 

 

But who am I to say anything. 

[Chinese_Propaganda 46]

29 minutes ago, hauptmann said:

Since partisans are basicly irregular troops and mostly fighting out of revenge, I think it would add to the roleplay experience if partisans were allowed to kill yielders without orders from an admin or an officer.

I agree with this in theory but after so long of the rule being enforced it would be hard to manage and keep track of and would ultimately end up with only one team in a battle being able to kill surrenderers. This might ultimately lead to a slight advantage to Russia. 

[Scandypandy 78]

Spoiler

personally I've always thought the surrender rule was fucking stupid and totally pointless in 99.9% of the circumstances in which people use it

Not like Partisans need ANOTHER reason to just fuck off and do their own thing, often invoking a slay from admins.

[SacrificialLamb 8]

Its a good idea in theory, but like others have said, it might be difficult to get right in practice. Also firing lines are always fun to see so we'll keep it as it is.

Keep giving us any more ideas about rule changes tho. Your interest is much appreciated Haupt.